I
Career & Pay
GS Scale · Locality · Promotions · TSP
II
Benefits
FEHB · FEGLI · FERS · Leave · Buyback
III
Workplace
Telework · RIFs · PIPs · Clearances
IV
Professional Development
Training · Certs · SES CDP · EMBA
V
Tools & Calculators
Pay · TSP · Leave · Buyback
Home Workplace SF-86 Guide
Workplace · Topic 33 · Security Clearance & Suitability

The SF-86 is 127 pages — and every answer is verified.

The Standard Form 86, officially the Questionnaire for National Security Positions, is the foundation of every federal security clearance investigation. Completed electronically through NBIS eApp (which replaced e-QIP in 2023-2024), the SF-86 covers 7-10 years of the applicant's life across 29 sections — personal identifying information, residences, employment, education, foreign contacts, foreign travel, financial history, criminal record, drug and alcohol use, mental health, and more. Investigators use the SF-86 as a starting point, then verify every answer through credit checks, agency records, field interviews, and document review. The Personnel Vetting Questionnaire (PVQ) is being developed to replace the SF-86 under Trusted Workforce 2.0, though full deployment continues through 2026-2027. Under 18 U.S.C. 1001, intentional falsification of the SF-86 is a federal crime punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Under SEAD 4, every SF-86 answer connects to one or more of the 13 adjudicative guidelines used in the clearance determination. This guide walks the complete form: what each major section captures, what investigators examine, common red flags, the disclosure strategy that protects applicants, and how the SF-86 will evolve under the PVQ. For clearance levels and tier framework, see Workplace Topic 32 on Security Clearance Levels.

If you are preparing to complete your first SF-86, facing a reinvestigation, or navigating a concern about specific disclosures, this guide covers the complete framework. The SF-86 is detailed, demanding, and legally consequential — but understanding what investigators examine and how to approach sensitive sections makes the process manageable.

29 sections
SF-86 covers identity through IT systems use
127 pages
Printed length; 8-15 hours typical first-time
7-10 years
Standard scope window (lifetime for some items)
18 U.S.C. 1001
Falsification = federal crime, up to 5 years
The Core Insight

The single most important rule of the SF-86 is that complete, honest disclosure is almost always treated better than omission discovered during investigation. Investigators are trained to find discrepancies — they compare your SF-86 against credit reports, agency databases, interview accounts, public records, and previous filings. A minor arrest from 10 years ago, a financial delinquency you resolved, or a foreign contact you haven't spoken to in years is unlikely to disqualify you. The same item concealed on the SF-86 and discovered by the investigator is far more likely to result in denial — because personal conduct under SEAD 4 Guideline E (candor, trustworthiness, reliability) is implicated in addition to the underlying concern. The second most important rule: precision matters. Exact dates, correct addresses, accurate contact information, and consistency across sections reduce investigator work and prevent unnecessary follow-up. Sloppy answers ("approximately 2018," "somewhere in Denver," "I think the supervisor was named Mike") turn a straightforward case into months of investigation. The third rule: prior filings are compared to current filings. If you listed one set of addresses on a 2016 SF-86 and different addresses on a 2026 SF-86, investigators will ask about the discrepancy. Maintain a personal reference document tracking your disclosures across investigations.

Section I The SF-86 in the clearance process

The SF-86 is the starting point of every national security clearance investigation at Tier 3 (Secret) and Tier 5 (Top Secret / SCI). Understanding its role in the overall process helps you complete it effectively.

Purpose of the form

Under E.O. 12968 Section 3.1 and 5 CFR Part 732, the SF-86 establishes the factual baseline for the background investigation. Investigators use SF-86 answers to:

Every answer on the SF-86 generates investigative activity. Incomplete answers generate follow-up requests; incorrect answers generate extended investigation; false answers generate adverse adjudicative outcomes.

NBIS eApp platform

As of late 2024, all federal agencies use the NBIS eApp platform to initiate background investigations, replacing the legacy e-QIP system. Key features of eApp:

The typical flow: your agency's security office sponsors you in NBIS eApp, you receive an invitation email with login credentials, you complete the SF-86 sections, and you submit to the sponsor for review and release to DCSA.

What happens after submission

After you submit the SF-86:

  1. Sponsor review — your security office reviews completeness before releasing to DCSA
  2. Case initiation — DCSA opens the investigation and begins automated records checks
  3. Records verification — FBI name check, OPM records, credit checks, law enforcement checks
  4. Field investigation (Tier 5) — investigator assigned; subject interview scheduled; neighbors, employers, references contacted
  5. Report generation — Report of Investigation (ROI) compiled with all findings
  6. Adjudication — agency or DCSA Consolidated Adjudications Services reviews against SEAD 4 guidelines
  7. Decision — favorable determination (clearance granted), statement of reasons (SOR) if concerns, or denial

Under current DCSA metrics, 90% of Tier 3 investigations complete within approximately 90 days and 90% of Tier 5 investigations complete within approximately 180 days, though timelines vary by case complexity.

Legal significance of signature

When you sign the SF-86 certification, you acknowledge:

The signature is legally binding. Investigators treat intentional false statements as both a security concern (personal conduct under Guideline E) and a potential criminal matter.

Section II Before you start — preparation materials

The worst approach to the SF-86 is opening eApp cold and attempting to reconstruct your history from memory. The right approach is gathering documentation before you begin.

Residence history — 10 years

Every address you have lived at for the past 10 years, including:

Common sources for residence reconstruction: tax returns, utility bills, bank statements, lease agreements, driver's license history, voter registration records.

Employment history — 10 years

Every employer, including part-time and contract work, with:

Sources: W-2s, tax returns, LinkedIn profile, prior SF-86 filings, HR records from previous employers.

Education — 10 years

Foreign contacts and travel

Under the SF-86's reporting standard, foreign contacts means individuals who are foreign nationals (not US citizens) with whom you have close and continuing contact — relationships characterized by frequent communication, close personal or professional bonds, or financial relationships. Information needed:

Foreign travel (for all purposes — personal, business, government) within the past 7 years (some sections 10 years), including dates and countries. US military deployments are typically listed separately in military history.

Financial records

Pull your credit report from all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion) before starting. Know what's on it. Common financial disclosure items:

For each financial item, know: creditor, original amount, current status, payment plan if any, and any supporting documentation.

References

You will need verifiable references — people who know you well enough to speak to your character, reliability, and trustworthiness. Investigators will contact them directly. Give references a heads-up that they may be contacted — a cold call from an investigator is not helpful to your case.

Criminal and legal records

Prior SF-86 filings

If you have completed a prior SF-86, retrieve a copy if possible (your agency security office may have one on file). Compare your current answers against prior filings — discrepancies are a flag investigators will ask about.

Section III Section-by-section walkthrough

The SF-86 has approximately 29 numbered sections (the number varies slightly by version). Each section has a specific focus and connects to one or more SEAD 4 adjudicative guidelines.

Sections 1-8 — Personal identifying information

Sections 1 through 8 cover core identity:

Investigators use these sections for identity verification — matching you against federal records, credit bureau data, and criminal databases. Common errors: mismatched SSNs (investigators cross-check with the Social Security Administration), incorrect DOBs, omitted aliases or maiden names.

Sections 9-10 — Citizenship

Section 9 covers your citizenship status, including:

Section 10 covers dual citizenship specifically. Dual citizenship is not automatically disqualifying but is examined under SEAD 4 Guideline C (Foreign Preference) — whether the individual has acted or would act to benefit a foreign country over the United States. Many clearance holders have dual citizenship.

Section 11 — Where You Have Lived (10 years)

Complete residence history with addresses, dates, and verifiers. Every address counts — even temporary stays at family members' homes during transitions. Gaps between addresses are flagged. Investigators conduct neighborhood checks at a sample of listed addresses.

Section 12 — Your Education

Schools attended, dates, and degrees. Verify against official transcripts. Investigators verify education through registrar contacts.

Section 13 — Your Employment Activities (10 years)

Complete employment history. Includes military service, civilian federal employment, private sector, self-employment, part-time, contract, and periods of unemployment. Every gap must be explained. Investigators verify through employer contacts — large gaps trigger additional investigation.

Section 14 — Selective Service Record

For male applicants, Selective Service registration status. Under the PVQ this question is being removed because the information is available through other means.

Section 15 — Military History

All military service including:

Dishonorable discharge is a Bond Amendment disqualifier. Other discharge types are evaluated under SEAD 4 Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct).

Section 16 — People Who Know You Well

Typically three references who have known you well for the past 7 years. Choose references who can speak to your character, reliability, and trustworthiness. Investigators will contact them directly.

Section 17 — Marital/Relationship Status

Current and former spouses, including dates of marriage and divorce. Also covers cohabitants. For each spouse/partner, identifying information and, if a foreign national, citizenship and related details.

Section 18 — Relatives

Parents, step-parents, siblings, children, and other relatives. Includes foreign national relatives with citizenship, country of residence, and contact information. This section is critical for SEAD 4 Guideline B (Foreign Influence) analysis. Investigators analyze foreign relatives for influence risk.

Section 19 — Foreign Contacts

Foreign nationals with whom you have close and continuing contact. The reporting standard is "close and continuing" — casual acquaintances do not meet the threshold. What counts:

Foreign contacts are examined under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The specific country matters — contacts in countries designated as of heightened concern receive more scrutiny.

Section 20 — Foreign Activities

Covers foreign travel, foreign business interests, foreign financial accounts, and foreign passports. Specific items:

Each foreign trip requires dates, countries, purpose, and who you visited or what you did. Frequent travel to countries of heightened concern generates expanded investigation.

Section 21 — Psychological and Emotional Health

This is the mental health section. The form explicitly states that mental health treatment in and of itself is not a reason to deny or revoke eligibility. Reportable items:

NOT reportable: routine counseling, marriage counseling, grief counseling, stress adjustment counseling, routine therapy for anxiety or depression without hospitalization. The form explicitly excludes these.

Section 22 — Police Record

Arrests, charges, and convictions. Covers:

The instructions explicitly require reporting of many items that a non-federal background check might not include. Read each subsection carefully. Omission of an arrest that later surfaces in investigation is a major Guideline E concern.

Section 23 — Illegal Use of Drugs or Drug Activity

Use of controlled substances as defined by federal law (including marijuana, which remains a federal Schedule I substance despite state legalization). Reportable:

Current drug use (within the past year for most agencies) is typically disqualifying. Past drug use is evaluated under Guideline H (Drug Involvement) — factors include recency, frequency, nature, age at use, and commitment to abstinence.

Section 24 — Use of Alcohol

Covers alcohol-related incidents:

Evaluated under Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption).

Section 25 — Investigations and Clearance Record

Prior security clearance investigations and determinations. Includes agency, date, type, and outcome. Also covers denials or revocations of clearances, access suspensions, and similar adverse security actions.

Section 26 — Financial Record

Financial disclosure covering:

Evaluated under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). For detailed coverage, see Workplace Topic 37 on Financial Issues.

Section 27 — Use of Information Technology Systems

Covers IT misconduct:

Evaluated under Guideline M (Use of Information Technology Systems).

Section 28 — Involvement in Non-Criminal Court Actions

Civil court involvement including lawsuits, divorce proceedings, restraining orders, and other civil actions. Generally examined for patterns suggesting judgment issues or untrustworthiness.

Section 29 — Association Record

Membership in or association with organizations that advocate overthrow of the US government, dedicate to use of violence or other unlawful means, or seek to deprive individuals of their rights. This section is narrowly tailored to specific categories of concerning organizations — standard political, religious, or civic organizations are not reportable here.

Signature and certification

The final section requires signed certification that the information is true and complete. Signing without having completed all sections accurately exposes you to 18 U.S.C. 1001 liability even if your intent was not to deceive. Review the entire form before signing.

Interactive Tool

SF-86 Disclosure Strategy Analyzer

Facing a specific SF-86 disclosure question? Input the section, nature of the issue, time frame, and prior disclosure history. The analyzer identifies your reporting obligation, the relevant SEAD 4 guideline, and the strategic approach for maximizing credibility.

SF-86 Section in Question
Nature of the Concern
Time Frame
Prior Disclosure History
Complete all inputs to see disclosure strategy analysis

Section IV Common red flags investigators hunt for

Beyond the specific items disclosed in each section, investigators examine patterns and characteristics of the SF-86 itself. Common red flags:

Inconsistencies across sections

The SF-86 asks similar information in different sections. Investigators flag:

Gaps in time

Unexplained gaps in residence, employment, or education history flag investigators. Common gaps that need explanation:

Every gap should be explained in the Optional Comments or Remarks section. "Unemployed" is an acceptable status; "unknown" is not.

Discrepancies with prior SF-86s

Prior SF-86 filings are retained and compared to current filings. Discrepancies generate follow-up:

Any discrepancy requires explanation. "I listed it incorrectly before" is an acceptable explanation if documented truthfully. "I didn't remember last time" requires explanation of what changed.

Vague or incomplete answers

Specific answers advance investigation; vague answers delay it. Examples of problematic phrasing:

Sophisticated language suggesting concealment

Experienced investigators look for linguistic patterns that suggest careful wording to avoid disclosure:

The adjudicative process considers not just the disclosed facts but the candor and completeness of disclosure. Literal truthfulness that obscures material information raises Guideline E concerns.

Refusal to disclose or hesitation

Investigators note applicant reluctance during subject interviews. Repeated "I don't remember" responses to questions about the past 10 years, defensive reactions to specific topics, or refusal to discuss matters specifically raised on the SF-86 are flags.

Information discovered elsewhere

The largest category of red flags is information the investigator discovers that was not disclosed on the SF-86:

Discrepancies between SF-86 disclosures and investigator findings are the most common cause of extended investigation and clearance adverse action.

Section V Handling sensitive sections — drugs, finances, mental health

Three sections generate the most applicant anxiety: drug use (Section 23), financial issues (Section 26), and mental health (Section 21). Strategies for each:

Drug use (Section 23)

The SF-86 asks about illegal drug use — including marijuana, which remains a federal Schedule I controlled substance regardless of state legalization. Key principles:

For drug-related disclosures, provide: the drug(s) used, dates or approximate frequency, circumstances (social, experimental, addictive), age at time, steps taken to stop (if applicable), and current commitment to abstinence. A signed statement committing to abstinence is often treated favorably.

Financial issues (Section 26)

Financial disclosures are among the most common clearance concerns because almost everyone has some financial history. Key principles:

For complete coverage of financial issues in clearance context, see Workplace Topic 37 on Clearance Financial Issues.

Mental health (Section 21)

The mental health section is written carefully to encourage treatment-seeking without creating disincentive. Key principles:

Under Guideline I, favorable prognosis from a treating mental health professional is a powerful mitigating factor. Obtain a letter if relevant.

Foreign contacts (Section 19)

Foreign contacts generate substantial anxiety but are rarely disqualifying. Key principles:

Full disclosure is the correct approach. Failure to disclose a foreign contact that surfaces through investigation is a substantial Guideline E and Guideline B concern.

Section VI How investigators verify your answers

Understanding the verification methods helps applicants prepare. Investigators use different methods depending on investigation tier.

Tier 3 (Secret) verification

Tier 3 investigations rely primarily on automated records checks and limited field work:

Tier 5 (Top Secret / SCI) verification

Tier 5 adds extensive field investigation:

The subject interview

For Tier 5 investigations, the subject interview is typically conducted in-person and may last 2-4 hours. The investigator:

Preparation for the subject interview: review your SF-86 thoroughly; bring copies of supporting documents (for financial disclosures, treatment records if relevant, foreign travel records); be honest and direct; don't volunteer information not asked about unnecessarily; acknowledge uncertainty when you are unsure rather than guessing.

Continuous vetting automation

After clearance is granted, continuous vetting (CV) provides ongoing verification through automated checks against criminal, financial, and public records databases. CV has largely replaced periodic reinvestigation for Secret (10-year) and Top Secret (5-year) clearances. For detailed coverage, see Workplace Topic 35 on Continuous Vetting.

Section VII The PVQ transition

Under Trusted Workforce 2.0, the SF-86 is being replaced by the Personnel Vetting Questionnaire (PVQ). The transition is ongoing as of 2026.

Overview of the PVQ

The PVQ consolidates the three separate forms (SF-85, SF-85P, SF-86) into a single unified form with modular sections. Applicants complete only the sections relevant to their specific position tier. Key features:

Key changes from SF-86 to PVQ

Notable substantive changes in the PVQ:

Current deployment status

As of early 2026, the PVQ is not in full active use. DCSA is working to integrate the PVQ into the NBIS eApp platform. Full deployment is expected in 2026-2027 contingent on NBIS development completion. During the transition period:

Preparing for either form

Whether you are completing the SF-86 or the PVQ, the underlying framework is the same. Preparation that supports accurate SF-86 completion also supports accurate PVQ completion:

When completing the SF-86

  • Prepare before opening eApp. Gather residence history, employment records, education records, passport, credit report, and supporting documentation.
  • Build a personal reference document with all disclosure-relevant history — this supports current and future filings.
  • Be completely honest. Under 18 U.S.C. 1001, intentional falsification is a federal crime with up to 5 years imprisonment. Discovered omissions are almost always worse than the underlying issue.
  • Be precise. Exact dates, complete addresses, full names, and specific amounts. Vague answers generate investigator follow-up and extended timelines.
  • Explain every gap. Unemployment, school, travel, caretaking — whatever the reason, document it.
  • For sensitive items (drugs, finances, mental health), disclose what's required and frame with context. Minimization and defensiveness create Guideline E concerns.
  • Understand the scope windows. 7-year for some items, 10-year for others, lifetime for serious items. Read each section's instructions.
  • Compare to prior SF-86 filings if available. Inconsistencies between filings generate follow-up investigation.
  • Give references a heads-up before the investigator contacts them. Cold calls to unprepared references hurt your case.
  • Review the completed form before signing. The signature is legally binding certification.
  • Save a copy of the submitted SF-86 for your records. You may need it for future filings or to correct discrepancies.
  • Understand your continuing obligations under SEAD 3 after submission — foreign travel, foreign contacts, financial changes, arrests, and other reportable events must be reported to your agency security office. See Workplace Topic 35 on Continuous Vetting.
  • If adverse action is proposed against your clearance based on SF-86 issues, consult counsel immediately. See Workplace Topic 34 on Clearance Denial.

Section VIII Frequently asked questions

Intentional omission or falsification of material information on the SF-86 is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. 1001, punishable by up to 5 years in prison. However, investigators distinguish between deliberate falsification and honest mistake or memory gap. If you realize you omitted information after submission, notify your security officer immediately in writing and provide the missing information — this self-correction is generally treated favorably. The adjudicator considers the entire record, including whether the applicant proactively disclosed information upon realizing the omission. What investigators treat most severely is information they discover through investigation that was omitted from the SF-86 — a credit check revealing undisclosed delinquencies, interviews revealing undisclosed foreign contacts, or background research revealing undisclosed prior arrests. In these cases, the omission itself often becomes a bigger problem than the underlying conduct. Personal conduct concerns under SEAD 4 Guideline E (trustworthiness, candor, honesty) frequently arise from SF-86 omissions, even when the underlying conduct (a minor arrest years ago, a resolved financial issue) would not itself have disqualified the applicant. The consistent rule: full disclosure upfront, even of embarrassing information, is almost always treated better than omission that is later discovered.

Different SF-86 sections have different scope windows. The primary scope periods are: 7 years for some items (certain police records, some financial items, some foreign travel), 10 years for most items (residence history, employment history, education, most foreign contacts and travel), and lifetime scope for the most serious items (felony convictions, use of explosives, domestic terrorism, deliberate unauthorized disclosure of classified information, military court-martials involving national security). The scope window is calculated backward from the date of SF-86 submission. For example, an SF-86 submitted in April 2026 with a 10-year scope for residence history requires listing every residence from April 2016 onward. Some sections ask for information since your 18th birthday if that is shorter than the scope window — relevant for younger applicants. Specific sections: Section 11 (Where You Have Lived) — 10 years. Section 13 (Employment) — 10 years. Section 20 (Foreign Activities) — 7 years. Section 22 (Police Record) — various depending on offense type; summary offenses 7 years, criminal and military court-martial 10 years or lifetime depending on severity. Section 26 (Financial Record) — 7 years for most items, longer for bankruptcies. Section 23 (Illegal Use of Drugs) — 7 years for most drugs, with narrower windows for recent use of marijuana. Read each section's specific instruction carefully.

No, in most cases. The SF-86 explicitly states that mental health treatment and counseling in and of itself is not a reason to deny or revoke eligibility for access to classified information. This is Section 21 of the current SF-86 and it is written with unusual clarity precisely because of historical concern that applicants would avoid needed mental health treatment to preserve clearance eligibility. Under SEAD 4 Guideline I (Psychological Conditions), the concern is whether a condition could impair judgment, reliability, or trustworthiness — not whether an applicant has sought treatment. In fact, seeking treatment for a condition is generally treated as a mitigating factor. Section 21 asks specifically about: (1) declaration of mental incompetence by a court or administrative agency (which is a disqualifier under the Bond Amendment), (2) court-ordered or required consultation, (3) hospitalization for mental health reasons, (4) specific conditions that could affect judgment. Routine counseling, therapy, medication management for depression or anxiety, marriage counseling, or grief counseling does NOT need to be reported under Section 21. The instruction explicitly excludes counseling for grief, marital problems, or stress adjustment not requiring hospitalization. Honest disclosure of reportable mental health items is the correct approach — the concealment, not the condition, creates the security concern.

Investigators verify SF-86 information through multiple methods depending on the investigation tier. For Tier 3 (Secret): automated national agency checks (FBI name check, OPM records, agency records), credit checks with the three major bureaus, local law enforcement checks at listed residences, employment verification with listed employers (often by written inquiry), education verification, and reference contacts (sometimes by letter rather than in-person). For Tier 5 (Top Secret and SCI): all Tier 3 checks plus in-person subject interview, in-person interviews with neighbors and co-workers at listed addresses and employers, in-person interviews with listed references, in-person interviews with spouse/partner and adult relatives, expanded financial review, expanded foreign contact review including counterintelligence database checks, and in some cases review of social media and public records. Investigators specifically cross-reference: SF-86 answers against credit reports (financial issues); SF-86 foreign contacts against counterintelligence databases; SF-86 employment history against tax records and employer verification; SF-86 residence history against local law enforcement records; previous SF-86 filings against the current filing for consistency. Discrepancies between the SF-86 and investigator findings are the most common reason for extended investigation and clearance adverse action.

The SF-86 is being replaced by the Personnel Vetting Questionnaire (PVQ), but the transition is ongoing as of 2026. The PVQ, developed under Trusted Workforce 2.0, consolidates the SF-85 (non-sensitive), SF-85P (public trust), and SF-86 (national security) into a unified, modular form. Key changes in the PVQ: modular structure (applicants complete only sections relevant to the position tier), modernized questions on mental health (focuses on hospitalizations and treatments within past 5 years rather than lifetime history), updated drug questions (marijuana questions shifted to past 90 days rather than past 7 years, though federal law still prohibits marijuana use), removal of gender, height, weight, hair color, and eye color fields, gender-neutral language throughout, removal of questions about Selective Service registration. As of early 2026, the PVQ is not yet in full active use. DCSA is working to integrate the PVQ into the NBIS eApp platform. Until the PVQ is fully deployed, applicants continue to use the SF-86 through NBIS eApp. Track your agency's security office for guidance on which form applies to your specific investigation.